Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Cult of Ustream Navbar"
(→Factions vs. Groups: added new section; edited other section to add discussion) |
(→Factions vs. Groups) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Factions vs. Groups== | ==Factions vs. Groups== | ||
So what exactly is the difference signified by "Factions" vs. "Groups"? I'd assume that it pertains to the connotation of a "faction" being something that is a part of the greater Cult rather than its own separate, self-identifying group, but I wanted to clarify that here just to be certain. --[[User:Eebit|Eebit]] ([[User talk:Eebit|talk]]) 06:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC) | So what exactly is the difference signified by "Factions" vs. "Groups"? I'd assume that it pertains to the connotation of a "faction" being something that is a part of the greater Cult rather than its own separate, self-identifying group, but I wanted to clarify that here just to be certain. --[[User:Eebit|Eebit]] ([[User talk:Eebit|talk]]) 06:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Personally I think that "groups" sounds a lot more informal than "factions", which is the primary reason that I made that change. Though yes "factions" does sound more like there is more to the various groups (lol) than just "the Cult" and "the Station" and "the Sealbreakers" (because OGX is still sort of affiliated with CoU, just with their own agenda; there are factions that I would not consider large enough to be "groups" at this moment, such as whatever's happening with Zio, the Erahvs/Helix team, Kuro, etc). {[[User:Keileon|Keileon]] || [[User Talk:Keileon|Talk]]} 08:43, 8 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:43, 8 October 2015
Welp
Can someone remind me how we were gonna fix up this navigation bar? I kinda forgot to make note of it... --Lord X-Giga-X (talk) 20:41, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
I didn't realize this was even here, haha. I think that changing or expanding the navbar's scope would be a good idea. It currently doesn't include things like the Seals of Ustream, the Euthorica Islands / Cult HQ (and other landmarks) as part of "Locations", a fair amount of the involved characters, and related concepts that would be helpful when contextualizing the canon. I don't know what kind of structure we want to give it, but I think that drafting up new ideas for representing the canon would be beneficial. --Eebit (talk) 06:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Factions vs. Groups
So what exactly is the difference signified by "Factions" vs. "Groups"? I'd assume that it pertains to the connotation of a "faction" being something that is a part of the greater Cult rather than its own separate, self-identifying group, but I wanted to clarify that here just to be certain. --Eebit (talk) 06:16, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Personally I think that "groups" sounds a lot more informal than "factions", which is the primary reason that I made that change. Though yes "factions" does sound more like there is more to the various groups (lol) than just "the Cult" and "the Station" and "the Sealbreakers" (because OGX is still sort of affiliated with CoU, just with their own agenda; there are factions that I would not consider large enough to be "groups" at this moment, such as whatever's happening with Zio, the Erahvs/Helix team, Kuro, etc). {Keileon || Talk} 08:43, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
